August 8, 2008 - 9:23am

The Bush Loyalty Score: US Senate

CQ Politics has examined all of the roll-call votes during the seven-and-a-half years of President Bush's two terms.  The chart is a fascinating look at how congressman have voted during the Bush administration.  According to the CQ website, "It is a first-ever look at the way lawmakers voted over an entire presidency. It underscores the high level of Capitol Hill partisanship that has been a hallmark of the period, and shows that while Republican support for President Bush was quite high, Democratic support was almost nonexistent in the House and very limited in the Senate."

Not surprisingly, both Senator Snowe and Senator Collins have the distinction of voting against the President more than any other Republican in the Senate.

Senator Snowe comes in at 73% in her support of the President.  That puts her at the bottom of the list of Republicans, and she is followed closely by Senator Collins who comes in at 77%.  To put that in perspective, Ben Nelson, a democratic from Florida, supported the president 71% of the time, while Bernie Sanders, from Vermont registered the least support for the president at 23%.

They also do a ranking of  "Party Unity"  which looks at all roll-call votes where an absolute majority of one party voted against an absolute majority of the other party. Again, Snowe brings up the rear for Republicans at only 59% with Senator Collins a close second at 64%.  Florida Democrat Ben Nelson from has the lowest party unity score at 56%

Overall the Senate was significantly more bipartisan than the US House scores, which will be coming up later.

Comments

77%


Nice scoop. But talk about burying the lede...

08/08/08 2:33 pm

what?


What is a lede? Maybe you should take more time editing and less time worrying about Susan Collins. You MUST be on Allen's staff, he tends to hire the smartest 3rd graders in Maine to run his campaign.

08/08/08 3:43 pm

Apparently, Grammar Watch,


you have no idea what a lede is. Maybe if you read more, you'd know.

Try out google. Educate yourself.

08/08/08 5:30 pm

Apparently, Anonymous1


Has nothing better to do than troll through posts to find someone who is "intellectually inferior" to tell them to "Google" and "Read more" in the same statement.

Less time being arrogant = more high quality posts.

Try it out...it works

08/09/08 12:09 pm

Comment viewing options

Select your preferred way to display the comments and click "Save settings" to activate your changes.

Post new comment

The content of this field is kept private and will not be shown publicly.
  • Web page addresses and e-mail addresses turn into links automatically.
  • Allowed HTML tags: <a> <em> <strong> <cite> <code> <ul> <ol> <li> <dl> <dt> <dd> <blockquote> <b> <i> <p> <br> <span> <img> <h1> <h2> <h3> <h4> <h5> <h6>
  • Lines and paragraphs break automatically.
  • Images can be added to this post.

More information about formatting options

CAPTCHA
This question is for testing whether you are a human visitor and to prevent automated spam submissions.
Image CAPTCHA
Copy the characters (respecting upper/lower case) from the image.