CQ Politics is an insider's publication for political junkies, and is generally very reliable for straight forward analysis of federal races. They have released their latest analysis of the races in Maine.
They give the nod to Obama, although they do spin the old First CD versus Second CD story - holding out the possibility of a McCain victory in Maine's second district.
Don't hold your breath.
When it comes to the Collins v. Allen contest they are clearly leaning in favor of Collins noting, "Collins, meanwhile, has some significant advantages as she seeks a third Senate term, including strong statewide job approval ratings and an ample campaign treasury.
However, they acknowledge that "... she faces a tough challenge from Allen, who also is well funded and has a base in the Portland-centered district where he regularly won his House races with 60 percent of the vote or more. CQ Politics still gives Collins the advantage rating the Senate race Leans Republican.
In the First Congressional District CQ Politics gives the advantage to Pingree highlighting her clear fundraising advantage as well as the fact the district leans Democratic. CQ does mention that Summers is a "capable candidate" but rates this race Democrat Favored.
According to a new poll taken for the Democratic Senatorial Campaign Committee, Senator Collins lead in the polls has shrunk and Allen now ... >
To view a larger version of this cartoon, click here. >
I attended my first political "house party" in 1994 when I was a senior in college. It was hosted by one of former U.S. Sen. George ... >
Because of their roles as advisors, negotiators, and spokespersons, chiefs of staff and communications staff are some of the most visible employees ... >
Think about Card Check when casting your vote
I'm hoping that the workers of Maine will bolt from their Big Labor Bosses and vote for Collins and Summers. Once they realize that Tom Allen and Chellie Pingree support eliminating workers' right to a private ballot when voting to unionize, they will take a pass on the candidates who take them for granted because of union bosses with deep pockets. Susan Collins and Charlie Summers won't play politics with basic voting rights. Allen and Pingree, on the other hand, already are.
re: EFCA
You need to go back wherever you came from and stop telling Maine voters what to do.
Big Labor Poster Boy
Anonymous1, imagine how the American political system would operate today if everybody you disagreed with was forced to shut up. You would be sitting pretty, but I doubt you would be on the Christmas card list of everybody else in the country.
But, you’re stubborn intolerance doesn’t surprise me. In fact, it’s typical of pawns of Big Labor. You’re like the child in the sandbox who kicks the other kids out because they want to build a sand castle instead of digging your hole. Or, to circle back to my original topic, a union thug who threatens and coerces workers into voting to unionize, regardless of whether or not that worker wants to.
Pay attention, PolitickerME readers. These are the type of people who support the Card Check legislation to eliminate workers’ right to a private ballot—the people who will be voting for Tom Allen and Chellie Pingree in November (with their own private ballot, I might add).
Right
Rich is right. After reading about the EFCA legislation that Tom Allen co-sponsors in the House, I am totally against the bill. I am now changing my vote from Allen to Collins because of this issue. I have many family members that are part of unions and this type of legislation would take away their right to a private ballot if they wanted to start a union at a new job.
Being opposed to the card check bill is totally opposite than telling someone what to do. EFCA will take away a private union election so the union bosses and management can see how the workers are feeling and leave them open to retaliation or coercion on how to vote.
Before casting your vote make sure you understand what Tom Allen is supporting. To me he is supporting tyranny instead of the democracy we have fought so hard for.
Allen's a progressive/liberal/socialist
Allen's cosponsorship of H.R. 800 stinks for sure. I've called his office and expressed my opinion of in kinder, gentler terms...As for people in Maine being told what to do---what's the big deal? Both major parties are always telling us what to do. As individuals, we can do our homework and choose how to vote. I'd recommend Third Party, preferably Libertarian or Constitution.
Truth about Card Check
The EFCA still maintains a private ballot!
If 30% of workers join a union, the employer has the right to call for a private ballot election.
What the EFCA would do is allow for the de-facto creation of a union if a majority of workers sign-up for one. So, if the majority of workers support a union, it allows them to express it either explicitly through the "card check" or privately through the ballot.
And all of you concern trolls can go to hell; if you are truly switching your support from Allen to Collins because of this legislation, you either don't have the facts on the EFCA or you're lying. I'm guessing it's the latter.
Another truth
Go to hell? Yikes! Maybe AnonymousEdge and Anonymous1 can carpool together to some anger management seminars. Remember the good old days when free thought and respect for differing opinions inspired intelligent conversations, not irrational contempt?
To accommodate our two fuming friends, perhaps Politicker should eliminate the comment function all together. Or better yet, we should just outlaw the internet…there is way too much individual expression and opposing points of view out there, anyway. We don’t want to anger our anonymous posters any more, do we?
But, before we go eliminating the World Wide Web to spare the feelings of our Big Labor buddies, remember that they are the type of people who will be looking over a worker’s shoulder making sure they sign a card to unionize.
Right on Rich
I am pretty sure that whoever Anonymous1 is hired by the 1.3 million Maine voters to speak on their behalf...right?
So I would go out on a limb and say that you don't speak for the majority of the people in this state who would think that "offering" a private ballot to employEEs is a cop out. They should be afforded the instant right to a secret ballot, just ask Rep. George Miller; ironically the co-sponsor of the EFCA bill, he wrote an open letter to the Mexican Government strongly urging them to provide secret ballots to all of the workers being pressured to organize.
Now Miller and his cronies in Washington (paid for and authorized by Big Labor) want to flip a U-Turn and talk out of the other side of their mouths. Now they want to offer the opportunity for workers in America to have less restraints to Unionizing...reading between the lines what it REALLY means is that it gives Labor Unions unprecedented access to workers and opening the flood gates for intimidation, bribery, blackmail and typical Union tactics to get whatever they want.
Unions bankroll more congressional/senatorial campaigns than any other group, is this what people REALLY want their dues to pay for? Who is truly looking out for workers? Not the Unions and it is fairly obvious Pingree, Allen, and their friends in Washington aren't either.
Rich
You're a liar.
EFCA RETAINS WORKERS RIGHTS TO A PRIVATE BALLOT.
Maybe you and your organization should stop trolling comment boards and go back to smoking cigars with Richard Berman down in DC. You guys are scared sh*tless of this legislation because you won't be able to discriminate anymore.
The only tyranny is under the current law, where employers can subject employees to mandatory anti-union propaganda. Under EFCA, you'd get a hefty fine.
So stop lying to the people of Maine.
Living in Maine...
...hey we're already IN hell my fellow citizen. High taxes, budget shortfalls, a lopsided, out of control, irresponsible state government, low wages...I could go on but I am in need of some prozac now.
whoa nelly
The Real Anonymous1 needs to take a quick look at their own pay stub. Maybe the people of Maine have gotten it right and are not going to put up with out of state money coming in to take their rights away. Like the people that pay you to scare Mainers into thinking that BIG corporations (which there are VERY VERY few of) are going to infringe on their rights. Which is absolute crap, why don't you take a real close look at the people you are talking to, and maybe try your garbage somewhere else.
We're tired of people like you moving to our state and trying to take away our way of life. We are people who pack town halls in the winter to hold town meetings, who come out 75% strong to vote in annual elections and big labor wants to throw us a bone with Card Check by offering or as you say preserving a right to secret ballot...isn't that a given? How many important votes outside of legislative bodies are held out in the open?
Your argument is crap, don't try to force feed us your talking points by making it seem like Unions are our best friends when they are trying to circumvent the democratic process by holding the hands of the legislators that they donated huge amounts of worker paid dues to get them elected in the first place.
Don't talk about "anti-union" propaganda when you know full well that "pro-union" propaganda isn't just propaganda; it is extreme tactics including destruction of property, coercion, bribery, intimidation and even in some cases assault...that in my book is NOT propaganda, it is illegal and this is what you will subject the people of Maine to if you try to elect people who want to unionize the entire state.
Still lying
Try attacking the substance of my argument.
Card Check was deemed constitutional by the Supreme Court of the U.S. Card check has and will stay around. Don't try to say this is something new.
EFCA retains the workers right to access a private ballot.
EFCA fines employers for using union-busting tactics and intimidating employees.
EFCA makes it easier for employees to unionize, either by card check OR private ballot.
EFCA forces employers to sit down and negotiate a contract.
Oh, by the way, I'm a 5th generation Mainer from a union family.
There is no substance
to your argument. Seriously, Card Check was deemed constitutional, as was slavery, segregation and keeping women away from the ballot boxes. Does it make it right?
EFCA eliminates any opposition to Unionizing. It squashes employEEs who may not want to unionize by allowing unions and their representatives to put an enormous amount of pressure on those who are against forming a union.
EFCA does not provide protection to employees who want to resist unionizing, it allows all of the protection to those wishing to Unionize. It allows for intimidation of employees.
Labor organizations should not have special rights to help employees form a union. There are no roadblocks so large that unions are impossible to form currently. What EFCA does is open the doors for unfair advantages to Big Labor to crush the interests of small business owners and the employees who may try to resist forming a union that is trying to take more money out of their hard earned paycheck week in and week out.
by the way, I am a 4th generation Mainer, with family coming from Italy where workers were treated so poorly that organized crime was the safest way to earn money...and yes, I too come from a family that has many members represented by unions.
They are the reason private ballots must be protected
Wow. The hostility on this forum demonstrated by Big Labor pawns in support of eliminating workers' rights to a private ballot is staggering.
If we can expect such rage from them on the comment section of politicker, what sort of coercion and threatening behavior can we expect when people like Anonymous1, AnonymousEdge, and The Real Anonymous1 have access to the names and addresses of workers who voted against organizing as a union?
There is a reason ballots should remain private; so that voters are afforded the peace of mind that lunatics with an agenda cannot track them down.
Leadership from former Dem Prez Candidate!
George McGovern wants to protect the private-ballot vote to unionize.
"My Party Should Respect Secret Union Ballots"
http://online.wsj.com/article/SB121815502467222555.html?mod=opinion_main...
To anonymousedge
You need to take a step back and think about EFCA in comparison to any democratic process.
How would you feel if on November 1st you were sitting at your home ready to vote for Tom Allen when three thugs knock on your door and bring a card with them. When you open the door they start to use strong intimidation tactics to swing your vote. You won't change your mind...you're voting for Tom Allen. They start to offer you incentives to change your mind. You don't.
They then decide to threaten you, that if you try to force a private ballot, they will get you fired from your job, cut your pension and make sure that you never get hired by another business that needs someone with your training. Finally you concede because it's not worth it to lose everything over one vote.
This is what EFCA opens the doors to.
Is this democracy? Or an Orwellian process? I do not want to see any of my neighbors have to feel that kind of pressure.
Post new comment