Rasmussen v Rothenberg
Last Week Scott Rasmussen told us that the Collins v Allen race was tightening up. In fact, according to Rasmussen, Allen had closed the gap to just 7 points. That was quite a move from the 15 point margin earlier in the Spring. It was pretty clear that the better Allen numbers were coming at a good time. Just a few short weeks ago, one of the third party groups, unionfacts.org released a poll trumpeting a 15 point lead for Collins. That news was quickly followed by news of a two million dollar cash on hand advantage for Collins. To say the Rasmussen numbers came at good time would be an understatement.
In fact, the Allen campaign was quick to distribute the good news via email stating, "
Today, I come to you with some fantastic news -an independent public polling firm has just released a poll that shows we have cut Senator Collins lead to just 7% points. We have been working hand in hand since this journey started almost 13 months ago, and today, our hard work is really starting to show. Rasmussen Reports' polling today confirmed what I already knew - that with your support and the supporters of thousands of other Mainers, we are going to lead the change this country desperately needs.
Here's the problem with the Rasmussen poll - no one knows for sure if the system used by Rasmussen is reliable. Some folks swear by the polls, while others, notably Chuck Todd and Stu Rothenberg, two very well regarded DC pundits discount the polls completely. Mr. Rothenberg in his column for Roll Call in which he evaluated the top ten US Senate races noted, "I must begin with one caveat: In evaluating races, I do not factor in certain widely circulated polls, including those conducted by Rasmussen Reports, that I regard as less reliable. (In other words, I treat some polls as if they don't even exist.)"
Incidentally,Rothenberg's column did not even include the Allen and Collins race in his top 10 Senate races. He did mention the following, "In sum, developments in two states, Minnesota and Maine, should have Republicans optimistic, while Democrats have reasons to be happy about some longer-shot races, as well as their top takeover opportunities."
Either way, it was a nice bounce for the Allen campaign. We will all have a chance -very soon-with the Critical insights Spring tracking poll, which should be out in the next week or so, to see if Rasmussen was a polling guru or just another reason to ignore public polls until the day after the election.
There are rumors, as well as Republican Party chatter that Republican Vice Presidential candidate, Sarah Palin is bound for Maine. The exact date ... >
To view more cartoons by Politicker.com editorial cartoonist Rob Tornoe, click here. >
I attended my first political "house party" in 1994 when I was a senior in college. It was hosted by one of former U.S. Sen. George ... >
It’s crunch time. Less than 30 days remain until we head to the polls to vote for President down to School Board—unless you’re joining ... >
Tom Allen is out of touch
Tom Allen is losing by double digits in the polls because of his out of touch policies with Mainers. For example, his support for a "card check" that would eliminate a secret ballot process to unionize would be detrimental to workers' rights in industry. This leaves the door open to coercion and retribution (or rewards) by union officials who will be able to stand over the shoulder of every worker while they vote.
Tom Allen is a Congressman who was elected by a secret vote in November on election day but he has no problem eliminating the same right of a secret vote for his constituents.
out in left field
Agreed. Allen's H.R. 800 needs to go the way of the dodo bird, IMO. What on earth would make me want to vote with someone looking over my shoulder?
Out of state Collins
Out of state Collins supporting groups are trying to fool Mainers with bogus claims about the card check bill.
Under current law, an employer, when presented with a card check union, can FORCE a secret ballot. The EFCA would do away with that hurdle, forcing an employer to accept a union based on the card check alone.
But the EFCA also has a provision in it for employees that may not want to represented by a union.
At any time of the card check process, if 30% of the workers (not potential union members but all workers) sign a petition demanding a secret vote on whether their shop should be unionized, then it must be held, and overseen by the NLRB.
I wish that were true
Living here in Maine for almost my whole lifetime doesn't change the fact about what the EFCA bill will do to the longstanding policies of the Labor Relations Board.
Having a union boss looking over your shoulder and being able to see if you want to unionize or not is unAmerican. And the consequences would be just as severe if you had to organize a petition drive at work!
Where is the common sense thinking? A fair and secret ballot that allows workers to choose if they want to unionize or not is the best way to go.
Post new comment