May 21, 2008 - 4:20pm
News

John Martin launches fedupwithDanaConnors.org....sort of

Ok, now I am interested in the People's Veto, and I have Senator John Martin to thank.

In a response to the Fed Up with Taxes Coalition, the "good" Senator from Aroostook issued a press release on Wednesday afternoon that went after Dana Connors, the President of the Maine Chamber of Commerce. From the release:

AUGUSTA-Assistant Senate Majority Leader John L. Martin, D-Aroostook County, today called on the Maine State Chamber of Commerce President Dana Connors to resign from the "Fed Up Taxes" coalition, who are trying to eliminate health care access for 18,000 working Maine families and kids.....

.... Mr. Connors has joined a powerful coalition of special interests funded by out-of-state beer and soda corporations who are intent on eliminating a key part of the health plan's funding source, which comes from an increase in the excise tax on high-volume out-of-state beer corporations and syrup used by soda companies. The coalition so far has taken $700,000 from out-of-state corporations like Coca Cola and Pepsi to hire a California-based company to collect signatures.

Not only does Senator Martin want Mr. Connors to resign from the chamber, he is asking the Governor to take him off all of the other boards he serves on. The Senator also got the obligatory whack at "Big Oil" noting, "you would think that the Maine Oil Dealers would be working harder for solutions to lower Maine people's oil bills rather than take away access to health care."

I'm not sure if anything John Martin says is true, one never knows. However, his attempt to reframe the debate as being anti-health care is smart and clever. The real question now -- is will Dana Connors and his minions return fire.

Don't hold your breath.

WALLY EDGE can be reached via email at politickerme@aol.com.

Comments

Wally, come on...


It's not an "attempt to reframe the debate as being anti-healthcare". This campaign by millionaire lobbyists IS an attempt to cut funding for healthcare!

At the very least, let's require those in favor of the "people's" veto campaign to admit that they are talking about cutting off funding for healthcare for thousands of people. Those are the facts.

05/21/08 7:43 pm

Thanks, Walt. All the


Thanks, Walt. All the debate thus far has been about beer taxes, soda taxes and other taxes. I had not heard it framed that way to date. That was the point I was making, nothing more.

05/21/08 8:17 pm

Corporate Veto


Senator Martin is right on target- the "people's veto" is funded by Coke, McDonalds, and the Oil Dealers and is run by an out of state firm for almost a million dollars. This debate is all about healthcare for Mainers. Most of the people in Monument Square with Newell today were lobbyists.

05/21/08 8:37 pm

Squandering Millions & Millions


Dirigo Health is an abject FAILURE. This program is government at it's worst; arrogant, wasteful, poorly designed & run by incompetent individuals who can't get a job in the private sector.

No competent manager could justify the subsidy cost (read: taxpayer ripoff) per person of this program.

People's Veto is needed to put the nail in Dirigo's coffin.

05/21/08 9:27 pm

Lobbyist Veto


It's shame that the reporting so far on the "Fed Up With Taxes Coalition" hasn't discussed the fact that this effort is entirely run by paid lobbyists.

At their very poorly attended event in Portland today, there were at least 7 lobbyists participating.

The lead speaker and MC: Newell Augur (lobbyist for the soda companies)
Present and on camera: Peter Gore (lobbyist for the Maine Chamber of Commerce); Kristine Ossenfort (lobbyist for the Maine Chamber of Commerce); Ann Robinson (Lobbyist for Anheuser-Busch); Richard Grotton (lobbyist for the Maine Restaurant Association); Chris Hall (lobbyist for the Portland Regional Chamber); John Delahanty (lobbyist for Nestle Waters).

Given all the scrutiny the media is giving to the lobbyists serving as campaign staff to John McCain, it seems like the public might like to know where else they can easily locate the species.

05/21/08 9:54 pm

wrong walt.


Walt, you don't understand how the veto process works do you?

If the people's veto is successful the SOP comes back into play. Meaning no one is going to lose their health care if the veto succeeds. No one will have the funding for the health care they get through Dirigo right now cut off.

05/21/08 10:48 pm

um, no


Taxpayer, do you know people or businesses that use Dirigo?

I do. They are not only excited about it, many of them couldn't afford healthcare any other way.

If this program is allowed to grow, it will only improve, and it will only get more affordable.

If you oppose Dirigo, that's fine. But be honest about the program. Maybe you need to talk to some people that are more familiar with it...

05/21/08 11:32 pm

er...


Link, have you ever bothered to ask why they couldn't afford it without Dirigo? and to head off the obvious answer, have you ever bother to ask why Maine's health care costs are so high and increase faster than the national average?

05/21/08 11:50 pm

Liberal Lies


Name one millionaire lobbyist who is involved. Oh, don't know any? Then you're lying. Just like John Martin.

Ahh, so you're in favor of limiting the free speech of those with whom you disagree politically. Good to know the Bill of Rights only covers those with whom you agree.

Don't put "people's" in derogatory quotes - it's the official term, according to Maine Law. It's not a political slogan. Grow up.

I'm thinking of starting JohnMartinIsACorruptHypocrite.com. Anyone want to support it?

05/22/08 7:15 am

The Truth


It's not about the large corporations - it's about the thousands of Maine small businesses, like restaurants and convenience stores, that will be negatively impacted by these taxes. While the effort may be supported by larger businesses who can afford to fundraise, in fact it's the small, mom-and-pop stores and restaurants that will be negatively impacted by this.

05/22/08 7:21 am

If Dirigo is such a fine,


If Dirigo is such a fine, stalwart program, why not fund it through the general fund? Oh, that would be because it would never fly! Liberals have to use back-door, middle of the night tricks to get the funding for a program that hasn't reached a single one of it's goals, and in fact, was advertised as eventually self funding. Most of the people on Dirigo ALREADY had insurance! If John Martin believes it is so worthy, why aren't the state's legislators and employees on this program? What's that? Crickets - I can't hear anything, can you?

05/22/08 7:56 am

Ok, Wally.


Didn't mean to bite your head off. While it's true that the public face of this campaign is not actively attacking Dirigo, there's no shortage of criticism of it from the supporters of that effort.

(David Hughes, for one, seems rather taken with the subject.)

And I don't think it's a stretch to say that the people who call Dirigo a "failure" are doing so because it makes is easier to justify a referendum that would remove funding that has been allocated to pay for healthcare for small business, children, and the elderly. That's a tough sell unless you can make people think the program is a disaster.

It's not. It's providing healthcare for small businesses and around 18,000 people that couldn't afford it before. If that's a "failure", then I'd like to see us "fail" some more.

05/22/08 8:41 am

Hughes - enlighten me


you say this:

No one will have the funding for the health care they get through Dirigo right now cut off.

The legislature funded Dirigo in the latest budget. This referendum seeks to repeal the revenue source for that funding.

How is that not cutting off funding?

If you're opposed to providing affordable healthcare, at least have the guts to say so. Don't pretend that isn't what this referendum would do.

05/22/08 8:45 am

DIRIGO Health


I voted FOR Dirigo Health during my time in the State Senate and wrote an OpEd piece in support of it.
However, as any prudent small business owner would do, we've now enjoyed time to see how it worked... and it worked poorly.
It cost Maine Taxpayers nearly $77,000 per enrollee to underwrite. That's just not sustainable!
It'd be cheaper to just write $12,000 checks to each enrollee.
And, since we cover families of five at 300% of Federal Poverty, and over 90% of Maine families of five make less than $75,000 a year, Dirigo is very rich in our coverage.
While a critical piece of the original intent, the FED's never kicked in enough money, and we knew that might occur even then.
Now, it's being subsidized by yet another tax on employers.
Why does the Maine Legislative Majority hate all business so? I guess that's for another day...)
It's time to pull the plug on Dirigo Health and take another look at solving the problem... which isn't "who has health insurance"? That's merely a subset of the greater issue: How long and how well do Mainer's live? What should be our goal? It's really about Mortality... not health insurance, or even health care access!
I was wrong to vote for Dirigo Health. It's time to CHANGE (okay, call me 'Obama of the Right').
One of the reasons that Maine Employer's Mutual worked so well was that Maine small businesses were forced, sometimes kicking and screaming, into the 21st Century and either cleaned up their act... or lost Woker's Comp. coverage.
There's a lesson to be learned from MEMIC to fixing the failed Dirigo Health scheme.

05/22/08 10:30 am

Interesting...


It's really about Mortality... not health insurance, or even health care access!

Isn't access to healthcare a pretty important factor in any discussion of mortality? (And isn't the prohibitively high cost of the for-profit health insurance industry a major factor that restricts access to health care?)

Or maybe you're saying that poor, elderly, and middle class Mainers have simply begun to expect a certain lifespan that is unreasonably long. Good luck selling that one!

05/22/08 10:47 am

JohnMartinisCorrupt.org


When Mr. Martin registers his new domain name, I'll register this one in memory of his "service" to the state of Maine.

Few have done so little with so much.

05/22/08 11:05 am

Corporate veto not!


Didn’t a bunch of poor young people start a veto effort before the big money? yes we did so don’t go saying that this is a corporate veto we backed fed up with taxes because we wanted to form a united front on this. Its ridiculous to say that I have millions of dollars. Please if your going to attack me get you info straight. This has always been about taxes. Maine is number two in the nation and moving up fast and me and my colleges will fight any new taxes no matter what.

05/22/08 1:36 pm

I meant stop taxing me will


I meant stop taxing me will fight any new tax so if you want to get involved go to www.stoptaxingme.org

thanks

05/22/08 1:42 pm

I call


Matthew Boucher - who is paying the out of state firm that's been hired to collect signatures?

You must have had to collect a LOT of bottles and cans, young man!

05/22/08 4:38 pm

The left would make us slaves...


As a hard working father of several children, I resent the constant implications by the left that any opposition to taxation is actually opposition to what that taxation is intended to fund. Every time we try to reign in spending by the fat cat profesional government types, they roll out the fire department, the police department, and the trash collection and claim we oppose those services.
I am sick and tired of listening to rich left wing types complain about the state of the poor, or "hard working families", and then take money from those same people to fund their own sticky fingers. I can't believe that the liberals in this state are so dumb that they have forgotten basic math! I wonder how many of them realize that if you raise taxes to 100% that the state will collect - $0. Do you want to help people like me? Then stop taxing people who are just getting by! People are literally being taxed into the poverty bracket in this state! I have become convinced that liberals don't want to fix problems, they WANT TO CREATE THEM! They want more of us dependant on them, because that is where their power comes from.
I qualify for a number of assistance programs - but I refuse to collect anything from them. My children are my responsibility, and I will support them, I will feed them, if only the government would get out of the way and let me! Freedom is the key to prosperity - not some socialist utopia these rich left wing elitists seem intent on imposing on us. The veto will be supported by alot of hard working poor people who are sick of being slaves to a state that takes so much of our earnings away that we can hardly get ahead. Dirigo is a hog - everybody who knew how to count knew it wouldn't work. The left should learn that putting a bandage on a corpse might make you feel like you've done something, but it help anyone!

05/22/08 7:09 pm

No.


I don't know what you've been reading, but this is not a discussion about "any taxation." It's about one specific bill, that was passed to fund one specific program.

If you think only "rich liberals" support Dirigo, then you don't know a thing about the people who use it. It's providing healthcare (good healthcare, from one of the highest-rated providers in the country) to 18,000 people and several thousand small businesses.

If you don't want to see the tax on beer raised for the FIRST TIME IN 40 YEARS, fine. But don't have a hissy fit about something you don't understand.

05/22/08 8:16 pm

like I said... the left makes slaves...


Link, you may know something about the people who are using dirigo, but you clearly don't know anything about the people who are paying for it...health insurance in this state went up through the roof thanks to government meddling in the first place. It is individual policy holders like myself that are bearing the brunt of this, and Dirigo has only made things worse. That is why this veto is going places...liberals don't realize that there are still a few people in this state that can count. (You know, simple logic like, if their funding plan worked, they wouldn't have to RAISE TAXES TO KEEP PAYING FOR IT) They understand that you can't provide for one group by skinning another group alive...cause nobody wins in the end. If they really cared about providing for people, they would allow us to be part of a bigger insurance pool like other states have done - or just permit me to buy insurance for my family out of state! Oh, wait, that would mean they couldn't have their hands in the cookie jar! My mistake.

05/22/08 10:12 pm

I turn my back on this thread for one day...


and BAM! - some simpleton compares raising taxes on beer and soft drinks to slavery. Seriously, pal... You might want to rethink that.

Mr. Boucher still hasn't responded to my question about who's paying for the signature gatherers, so I'll respond to you, Chris:
You say "people are being taxed into the poverty bracket." Bull. Show me one case of someone actually paying so much in taxes that they fall below the poverty line. One case. I'll start my stopwatch now...

And then you say "health insurance in this state went up through the roof thanks to government meddling in the first place".

Well, you're half right. This state does have some healthcare laws that restrict the way health insurance companies can treat sick people, old people, etc... If it wasn't for those laws, it would be theoretically possible for healthy, young people to get cheaper policies. However, without those laws, it is just as possible for insurance companies to simply dump people when they get older or when they get sick. In other words, when they actually NEED health insurance.

And allowing for-profit companies to charge outrageously high rates on older and sick people just so younger people can (temporarily) pay less is no solution.

As for allowing people to buy out of state plans, (also known as the McCain plan) that would work out pretty much the same way it worked out with credit card companies. In other words, the consumer would get hosed. A good explanation of how and why is here.

05/23/08 8:25 am

Walt - Your health care


Walt -

Your health care assertions are false. Maine has a health care system that is bankrupt. The pursuit of Dirigo to the exclusion of all else is a disaster. Democrats have made health care about politics, not affordability.

Maine's approach to health care has been a 15 year experiment that failed. that's it.

It is entirely reasonable to explore other options.

I don't really care about the tax veto thing.

05/23/08 9:56 am

Blanket statements...


False, huh? Any evidence whatsoever to back that up?

When you say Maine's health care system is bankrupt, what do you mean? As of the beginning of this fiscal year, all of the state's programs are fully funded. (As they are every year, thanks to the state constitution.)

05/23/08 10:07 am

Walt


Walt, if the veto is successful then the funding that was in place last year goes on. Those 18,000 people ( 4,000 on MaineCare, about 8,000 that had health insurance before Dirigo ) will still have Dirigo. No changes to a program that by any objective measure has failed to deliver.

The money that Dirigo is claimed to have saved us comes almost entirely from reductions that have nothing to do with bad debt or charity care.

The elderly don't use Dirigo. The disabled don't use Dirigo.

Young families that may benefit from Dirigo coudld have been helped from existing mechanism available to the MaineCare program are far lower cost than Dirigo.

Cost shifts from Medicaid/Medicare programs represents about 150 million dollars shifted onto the private payers of all types....unfortunately those private payers represent about 30% of the population. The more people we put on MaineCare the faster our health care costs will grow because MaineCare's re-imbursement rates are so low. The older our population gets the faster our health insurance costs will grow because of the low reimbursement rates of Medicare.

Taxing medical claims to lower the cost of health insurance cannot work. You tax things you want to discourage the use of, not the things you want to encourage the use of.

All government money ultimately comes from business. People buying and selling things, either on their own or through a company or indirectly through investment of some type. Making it harder and harder to buy and sell things at a price people are willing to pay just makes it harder and harder for government to take in money.

Maine's policies make sense if Maine was an island unto itself. We are not. Our people vote with their feet and their wallets every day.

05/23/08 12:01 pm

fully funded? ha-ha


Walt, if there wasn't a way around the constitutional requirement to fully fund all programs just how is it the state ended up owing the hospitals over 300 million? Further explain why it is the hospitals weren't getting paid and no plans were being made to pay them until it looked like the hospitals would come out in favor of TABOR.

fully funded.....what a laugh.

Is that like the revenue bonds the state issues without voter approval even thought the constitution requires voter approval for all bonds over a certain dollar limit?

Is that like the majority budget even though the constitution requires a 2/3rds vote on the budget?

Playing end runs around the constitution is part and parcel for the current crop in Augusta.

05/23/08 12:06 pm

What a simpleton I am...


You know, since I was originally posting my frustration with martin for suggesting that it was out of state corporate types that were supporting the veto and not maine people, and that they were doing it to take away people's health care, I guess I got a little carried away.

You see, I've been reading American History lately, and I seem to remember some guys who were really upset that their government imposed some kind of beverage tax without letting them have any say in the matter. They had names like Patrick Henry, John Adams, Thomas Jefferson, etc. It seems that they claimed that such taxation was slavery! They were so upset that they started their own people's veto - only they did it with muskets. Can you imagine getting that upset over a tax on tea? What a bunch of simpletons!

Oh, and I think you are right about the fact that Maine isn't taxing people into the poverty level. I went over the taxes we have again - let's see, there's property taxes, (you know, the kind where you ransom your house from the government every year so that you can stay in it) then there's income tax (but that is only for rich people who make more than say $10,000 a year or so.) Then there is a 5% sales tax on luxury items like clothes, soap, shoes and such. Let's see, there's the snack tax for rich people who enjoy popcorn, the gas tax for rich people who drive to work, registration fees for rich people who own cars so they can go to work, phone taxes for rich people who have a phone, licence fees, etc. You know, I can't think of a single one of these taxes that people in the poverty bracket have to pay! What was I thinking?

05/23/08 11:58 pm

If Dirigo is such a good


If Dirigo is such a good thing why is it closed to new people? How many people on Dirigo already had health insurance with their employees, like Hannah/Chellie Pingree's employees, why won't state employees join, more people lower rates. If it is such a good thing let our folks in Augusta donate the wages we pay them to support it, after all serving is not about the money, it is serving the voters. Or better yet let the state start running the hospitals, they have done such a good job of running an insurance company. Enough with the taxes, where do I sign the petition!

05/24/08 8:11 am

I really want to see the press release in full


"... who are trying to eliminate health care access for 18,000 working Maine families and kids....."

See, Martin is getting away with a lie here. I'd call it misleading but Martin knows full well that if the veto effort succeeds that nothing changes in regards to Dirigo. It goes on just as it has gone on with the SOP. Killing the tax does not eliminate health care access for 18,000 people. Saying that it does is just outright fabrication or misunderstanding. Now tell me, does anyone here think Martin misunderstands anything in regards to legislation he fights for?

Come on Wally, show us the full press release so we can tear it to shreds just like the last missive from Martin.

05/24/08 9:42 pm

Comment viewing options

Select your preferred way to display the comments and click "Save settings" to activate your changes.

Post new comment

The content of this field is kept private and will not be shown publicly.
  • Web page addresses and e-mail addresses turn into links automatically.
  • Allowed HTML tags: <a> <em> <strong> <cite> <code> <ul> <ol> <li> <dl> <dt> <dd> <blockquote> <b> <i> <p> <br> <span> <img> <h1> <h2> <h3> <h4> <h5> <h6>
  • Lines and paragraphs break automatically.
  • Images can be added to this post.

More information about formatting options

CAPTCHA
This question is for testing whether you are a human visitor and to prevent automated spam submissions.
Image CAPTCHA
Copy the characters (respecting upper/lower case) from the image.