Just beneath the surface in the Maine Senate there is angst, and the cause is Senator Bill Diamond. A self-declared “moderate”, representing a large swath of Cumberland County just west of Portland, is making a name for himself by playing up his moderate credentials. That might not matter if he were serving in the House, where Democrats enjoy a 25 plus seat advantage, but in an 18-17 Senate, one is always a big number.
The power of one was evident on Thursday night during the budget debate, where Senator Diamond introduced his budget amendment. The amendment attempted to resolve most of the major differences between Republicans and Democrats – before they decided to go their separate ways. There is a chance that his amendment could be the final piece needed for a two-thirds budget. The amendment passed 22-13, which raises another point about the power of one – there are others ----moderates---on both sides who are becoming more emboldened now that Diamond has decided to play this role. In fact, the Diamond amendment was actually a collaborative effort among several moderates including, Senators Nutting (D), Mills (R), Turner (R) and McCormick (R) and perhaps others. In the final vote on the amendment, Senator Diamond was joined by a number of “suspected” moderates from his own party. In addition to Nutting; Marrache, Hobbins, Sullivan and Damon also jumped on board with the Diamond amendment.
Senator Nutting also flexed his moderate muscle last night by getting his own amendment added, by one vote—his—in an 18-17 vote where all 17 republicans supported his effort to eliminate 13 positions in State Government. Nutting also pitched in to help Republican Kevin Raye add his amendment, which would study Mental Health services and how they are delivered. That also garnered an 18-17 vote.
One can be a very lonely number, but fortunately for Senator Diamond it looks as though he is attracting a crowd.
While some Democrats had been turning to sites like eBay and Craigslist hoping to scoop up scalped tickets to see U.S. Sen. Barack ... >
Check back tomorrow morning to view my sketchpad for day three of the Democratic National Convention, and go to my national blog to follow >
Bipartisan Solutions
I have not studied substantially the particulars of these amendments, but from a general principle perspective, I am always very pleased when members of both parties reach out and work together to find solutions in Maine.
It appears (although it remains to be seen and anything is of course still possible) from press accounts that legislators may indeed be able to bridge some of the differences collaboratively in a bipartisan fashion. This is fantastic (of course the "devil is also in the details", to insure that all compromises are honorable ones).
Maine needs solutions. We need to work together to address this budget crisis (and in general). After the highly acrimonious partisan split in the prior Maine budget cycle (Republicans quoted as budget forced down their throats), this would be a nice and welcome difference if it occurs. I hope it does.
Finding solutions (which I realize is sometimes actually the assessed best of the worst when faced with unpleasant and painful choices) in a collaborative fashion for Maine. Can you think of a more compelling definition of leadership?
As a PS, I don't know Senator Diamond well, but I have had some communication with him and from that I have been very highly impressed with his responsiveness, professionalism, and intelligence.
Bipartisanship means squat.
So you haven't really figured out what the amendments mean but you like the fact that both Ds and Rs voted for them? What kind of analysis is that?
It doesn't matter who votes for a bill and who doesn't. It doesn't matter if R's are on board, or if a D majority shoves it down their throat.
What really matters, always, is THE BILL ITSELF. Clearly, a lot of senators would rather pat themselves on the back for getting along.
Wake me when it's over.
Post new comment