August 24, 2008 - 11:32am
News

Kaplan: Fewer reporters means incumbent advantage

Former Portland Press Herald Reporter Jonathan Kaplan has an interesting column in The Washington Post this morning about the dwindling press corps in Washington. 

Kaplan was laid off from the Press Herald in a recent round of layoffs that resulted in the closure of the paper’s Washington D.C. and Augusta bureaus.

Kaplan writes:

“The biggest losers in these cutbacks, of course, are the citizens of Maine and the other states where newspapers have closed their Washington bureaus. My main gripe is that the loss of regional reporters just gives one more advantage to incumbents seeking reelection. Even in 2006, a year in which a Democratic tide swept Republicans out of office, 94 percent of incumbents in the House were reelected, as were 79 percent of those in the Senate, according to OpenSecrets.org, a nonpartisan Web site that keeps track of election spending and data.”

Check it out here.

JESSICA ALAIMO is a PolitickerME.com Reporter and can be reached via email at jessica.alaimo@politickerme.com.

Comments

Quit Whinning


This story premise would be fine except that the press corps has been NOTHING but a MOUTHPIECE for the Democratic Party and its hacks for many years. If reporters actually conducted investigative journalism and reviewed policy matters with an objective perspective, then their loss might be felt by the public.

As things stand now, we will notice VERY LITTLE difference in coverage since reporters have just been reprinting press releases and Democratic Talking Points for years.EhxFY

08/25/08 1:09 pm

@taxpayer You really would


@taxpayer

You really would not like that. Investigative journalism would have to actually use scientific sources that point to more liberal actions instead of using the usual "experts" from "organizations" posing as trusts sources when they are actually backed politically or by special interest groups.

There is certainly a disgusting amount sensationalism in the news but the Republicans have been using disinformation in the media quite effectively as well. Because you claim a Democratic conspiracy perhaps you should read Phase II of the Senate Report on Pre-war Intelligence on Iraq. Note that is was a bipartisan commette and had a Republican majority.

"repeatedly presented intelligence as fact when in reality it was unsubstantiated, contradicted, or even non-existent. As a result, the American people were led to believe that the threat from Iraq was much greater than actually existed.”

Tell me again who has the hacks?

08/25/08 2:16 pm

Where is my $20 Million?


Well, let's start here:

Where is the $20 million the Maine State Treasurer "invested" on behalf of Maine Citizens?

Very LITTLE coverage currently on the outcome of this matter by reporters.

No research or reporting as to how "qualified" the recent State Treasurers have been. Before the current Treasurer, there was Dale McCormick & Sam Shapiro both were "hacks" that had no qualifications to do the job other than raising FUNDS for Democratic Candidates.

'nuff said about the lack of real reporting.

08/26/08 10:45 am

Comment viewing options

Select your preferred way to display the comments and click "Save settings" to activate your changes.

Post new comment

The content of this field is kept private and will not be shown publicly.
  • Web page addresses and e-mail addresses turn into links automatically.
  • Allowed HTML tags: <a> <em> <strong> <cite> <code> <ul> <ol> <li> <dl> <dt> <dd> <blockquote> <b> <i> <p> <br> <span> <img> <h1> <h2> <h3> <h4> <h5> <h6>
  • Lines and paragraphs break automatically.
  • Images can be added to this post.

More information about formatting options

CAPTCHA
This question is for testing whether you are a human visitor and to prevent automated spam submissions.
Image CAPTCHA
Copy the characters (respecting upper/lower case) from the image.