The Center for Responsive Politics found this week that while many perceive John McCain as the candidate backed by the oil companies, Barack Obama gets his share as well.
The center found that of the two major party candidates, McCain benefits the most from the industry itself, however Obama gets more from individual donors who are employees of the largest companies in the industry.
This distinction was made in Maine today as the two state parties exchanged jabs over energy prices, each saying the other’s candidate should do something to bring immediate relief to citizens.
Democrats held an event at the Pop Shoppe Diner in Lewiston, where they said McCain’s policies are disastrous for small business owners. They staged a mock check presentation – a fake $2 million check made out to McCain from “Big Oil.”
"Maine families and businesses are struggling under the high price of gas and heating oil," said Senate President Beth Edmonds, according to a release. "We need a president who will stand up for Mainers by delivering relief today while building a secure energy future. John McCain is offering more of the same, with his plan to give $4 billion more in tax breaks for oil and gas companies. Barack Obama understands the enormity of this crisis and has put forward common-sense solutions that will ease the pain at the pump and move America to energy independence."
Later in the day, the Republicans shot back.
“If anyone knows about not delivering immediate price relief at the pumps, it’s Barack Obama,” said Maine GOP Chairman Mark Ellis in a release.
Ellis noted the measures Obama has opposed: a summer gas tax holiday, off-shore drilling and nuclear plants.
“The bottom line is that while Mainers struggle to put gas in their vehicles and heat their homes this winter, Barack Obama is refusing to support reasonable plans that would lower fuel costs,” Ellis said. “Meanwhile, Obama tries to run from his vote in support of the 2005 energy bill – which John McCain opposed – and the fact that Obama has received more contributions from oil company executives than John McCain. Regardless, it’s clear Obama doesn’t have the necessary experience to lead America to energy independence and John McCain does.”
The moral of the story? The Republican Party has some soul searching to do. >
Janet Napolitano, the Democratic governor of Arizona and an early supporter of Barack Obama's presidential campaign, is being mentioned for ... >
I attended my first political "house party" in 1994 when I was a senior in college. It was hosted by one of former U.S. Sen. George ... >
Republicans across Maine were decimated on Election Day. Two incumbent Republican state senators were knocked off, and Democrats picked up additional ... >
Energy
There Mark Ellis goes on lying again. "reasonable plans to lower fuel costs"? A lie. Does anyone in this country believe that the Republicans can build 45 Nuclear Plants in 22 years. Does any one believe we have the industrial capacity to built, manage, and monitor 45 new Nuclear plants. Does anyone believe we have solved the 250,000 year disposal problem. Wishful thinking at best. Anyone want to bet that a proposal to put a nuclear plant in Bar Harbor might face some opposition.
The energy department study proves that if we licensed off shore oil drilling today it would be seven years before a drop of oil was produced and 22 years before production was high enough to affect prices. Just one example, the Tahiti oil field in the Gulf of Mexico was discovered in 2002 and will not produce any oil until next year. And that doesn't count the licensing, permitting, surveys, and test well drilling required to find the field. And who says the oil companies will drill. They need something near $50/b to make a profit. If the price of oil falls below that they we stop drilling and pumping.
So the republican plan is to sacrifice Mainers' lives this winter for oil company profits and donations to the Republican Party. John McCain received $1 million in donations in a week after endorsing this plan.
I don't see contributions from workers in oil companies as in any way the same as donations from management and management PAC's particular since those are reimbursed by the company. They workers contributions aren't.
Post new comment